Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage of somekey caches

[Christoph Lameter]

Richard Kennedy wrote:

> before
> dentry             82136  82137    208   19    1 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata   4323   4323      0
> after
> dentry             79482  79482    208   39    2 : tunables    0    0    0 : slabdata   2038   2038      0

19 objects with an order 1 alloc and 208 byte size? Urgh. 8192/208 = 39 and not 19.

Kmemcheck or something else active? We seem to be loosing 50% of our memory.

Pekka: Is the slabinfo emulation somehow broken?

I'd really like to see the output of slabinfo dentry.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/