Re: [PATCH 1/7] dynamic debug v2 - infrastructure
From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Jul 17 2008 - 03:05:53 EST
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:31:08PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index 1a06026..fb03dbc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -592,7 +592,11 @@ extern const char *dev_driver_string(struct device *dev);
> #define dev_info(dev, format, arg...) \
> dev_printk(KERN_INFO , dev , format , ## arg)
>
> -#ifdef DEBUG
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PRINTK_DEBUG)
> +#define dev_dbg(dev, format, ...) do { \
> + dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, format, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } while (0)
> +#elif defined(DEBUG)
> #define dev_dbg(dev, format, arg...) \
> dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG , dev , format , ## arg)
> #else
In looking at your follow-on patches, where you add this to subsystems,
it seems that you have to add a lot of #include <linux/dynamic_printk.h>
lines.
And in looking at this modification to device.h, I think lots of the
kernel should break, but you are getting it "for free" by including the
.h file within kernel.h.
Why not also include it here in device.h?
Also, with this change, code that is already using dev_dbg() today is
instantly converted over to this logic now, right?
Anyway, this looks great, no objections from me at all, very good work.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/