Re: [PATCH] Fix collateral damage to top level Makefile
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Thu Jul 17 2008 - 04:51:33 EST
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 16:27 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:06:55AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The patch named "powerpc/mpc5121: Add clock driver", also contained
> > an unrelated and bogus change to the top-level makefile. This patch
> > backs out the bad bit.
> >
> > SHA1 of offending patch: 137e95906e294913fab02162e8a1948ade49acb5)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > If the maintainer who picked up this patch (Grant Likely) had done
> > his job, this cack-up never would have happened. Why do we still
> > have to deal with such sloppy individuals?
> >
> I think the more important question is why the hell would anyone put that
> in a Makefile, ever? ;-)
Well, it's partially my fault for not spotting it when pulling in
Grant's git and pushing out to Linus.
Anyway, it's a mistake, shit happens, I doubt Grant will do that one
twice :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/