Re: [PATCH 1/2] signals: kill(-1) should only signal processes inthe same namespace

[Pavel Emelyanov]

Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> While moving Linux-VServer to using pid namespaces, I noticed that
> kill(-1) from inside a pid namespace is currently signalling every
> process in the entire system, including processes that are otherwise
> unreachable from the current process.

This is not a "news" actually, buy anyway - thanks :)

> This patch fixes it by making sure that only processes which are in
> the same pid namespace as current get signalled.

This is to be done, indeed, but I do not like the proposed implementation,
since you have to walk all the tasks in the system (under tasklist_lock,
by the way) to search for a couple of interesting ones. Better look at how
zap_pid_ns_processes works (by the way - I saw some patch doing so some
time ago).

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> index caff528..4cf41bd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ static inline struct pid_namespace *get_pid_ns(struct 
> pid_namespace *ns)
>   extern struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsigned long flags, struct 
> pid_namespace *ns);
>   extern void free_pid_ns(struct kref *kref);
>   extern void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns);
> +extern int task_in_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
> +			  struct pid_namespace *pid_ns);
> 
>   static inline void put_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns)
>   {
> @@ -72,6 +74,12 @@ static inline void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct 
> pid_namespace *ns)
>   {
>   	BUG();
>   }
> +
> +static inline int task_in_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk,
> +				  struct pid_namespace *ns)
> +{
> +	return 1;
> +}
>   #endif /* CONFIG_PID_NS */
> 
>   static inline struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct 
> task_struct *tsk)
> diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> index 98702b4..3e71011 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,26 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
>   	return;
>   }
> 
> +/*
> + * Checks whether tsk has a pid in the pid namespace ns.
> + * Must be called with tasklist_lock read-locked or under rcu_read_lock()
> + */
> +int task_in_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> +{
> +	struct pid *pid = task_pid(tsk);
> +
> +	if (!pid)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (pid->level < ns->level)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (pid->numbers[ns->level].ns != ns)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
>   static __init int pid_namespaces_init(void)
>   {
>   	pid_ns_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(pid_namespace, SLAB_PANIC);
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 6c0958e..93713a5 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1145,7 +1145,8 @@ static int kill_something_info(int sig, struct 
> siginfo *info, int pid)
>   		struct task_struct * p;
> 
>   		for_each_process(p) {
> -			if (p->pid > 1 && !same_thread_group(p, current)) {
> +			if (p->pid > 1 && !same_thread_group(p, current) &&
> +			    task_in_pid_ns(p, current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
>   				int err = group_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
>   				++count;
>   				if (err != -EPERM)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/