Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?

[Alan Cox]

> maybe we could have 2008.7 instead. Or just increment the major version 
> every decade, the middle version every year, and the minor version every 
> time we make a release. Whatever.

Why 2008 ? We have lots of year systems beyond the specific Western one.
Surely "38." as the Unix epoch time...

And .. 2008 sounds so "old Windows numbering"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/