[PATCH] x86: Move dma32_reserve_bootmem() after reserve_crashkernel()
From: Bernhard Walle
Date: Fri Jul 18 2008 - 13:07:36 EST
On a x86-64 machine (nothing special I could encounter) I had the problem that
crashkernel reservation with the usual "64M@16M" failed. While debugging that,
I encountered that dma32_reserve_bootmem() reserves a memory region which is in
that area.
Because dma32_reserve_bootmem() does not rely on a specific offset but
crashkernel does, it makes sense to move the dma32_reserve_bootmem()
reservation down a bit. I tested that patch and it works without problems. I
don't see any negative effects of that move, but maybe I oversaw something ...
While we strictly don't need that patch in 2.6.27 because we have the
automatic, dynamic offset detection, it makes sense to also include it here
because:
- it's easier to get it in -stable then,
- many people are still used to the 'crashkernel=...@16M' syntax,
- not everybody may be using a reloatable kernel.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 531b55b..74d110e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -792,10 +792,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
initmem_init(0, max_pfn);
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- dma32_reserve_bootmem();
-#endif
-
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
/*
* Reserve low memory region for sleep support.
@@ -810,6 +806,15 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
#endif
reserve_crashkernel();
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ /*
+ * dma32_reserve_bootmem() allocates bootmem which may conflict
+ * with the crashkernel command line, so do that after
+ * reserve_crashkernel()
+ */
+ dma32_reserve_bootmem();
+#endif
+
reserve_ibft_region();
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK
--
1.5.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/