Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> ...
> > 
> > in hindsight core/percpu indeed looks unfinished and direction-less 
> > without core/percpu-zerobased - but the latter is not stable yet.
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> 
> Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4.  The earlier problems came 
> about using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went 
> wrong. (And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.)

well, the crash report i gave you was with gcc-4.2.3. Or is that one 
resolved?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/