Re: [patch 1/3] fastboot: Create a "asynchronous" initlevel

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:20:06 +0200
Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 20-07-08 13:10, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:23:31 +0200
> > Rene Herman <rene.herman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> Yes, I see. Unfortunately, WITH your patches, driver_probe_done()
> >> would also no longer be safe when run from a late_initcall() it
> >> would appear.
> > 
> > true for now (but see below)
> > 
> >> I have the sneaking suspicion that this is a bit of a fundamental
> >> issue. Turning some of the driver level (6) async basicaly removes
> >> the ordering between drivers and late_initcall (level 7).
> > 
> > I was hoping to not need this ordering. 
> 
> May have found an issue with 3/3 for this same reason. 


> > Thankfully it doesn't destroy it, the reason for this is that level
> > 6 itself tends to take long enough to get benefits. It's just that
> > if we can get both 6 and 7 it's nicer. But if we end up needing to
> > sync, so be it.
> 
> I worry...

ok you convinced me... I'll post a followon patch that will have this
shortly once it finishes compiling/booting.

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/