Re: [patch 4/4] KVM-trace port to tracepoints

[Avi Kivity]

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> That's true - as long as you don't have to add/remove/modify
> tracepoints. I had to do this job in the past (not for KVM). Having 1
> spot in 1 file (based on generic probes) would be handier in that case
> than 5 spots in 3 files. But if the KVM tracepoints are considered
> stable in their number and structure, that shouldn't be an issue here.
>
>   

Tracepoints aren't stable; they are artefacts of the implementation.


--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/