Re: recent IDE regression
From: Ben Dooks
Date: Fri Jul 25 2008 - 18:17:20 EST
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 09:37:25AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Ben Dooks wrote:
> >
> > personally, i would much prefer to see the loop being less evil
> > like:
> >
> > for (p = s; p < end; p += 2)
> > be16_to_cpus((u16 *)p);
>
> Well, in this case, the code actually depends on 'p' being back at the
> start of the buffer by the end of it all, so it would need some more
> changes than that.
I'm not adverse to the loop running backwards, it is just that we end
up evaluating macro with side-effects to the pointer itself, which is
"just asking for trouble".
for (p = end ; p != s; p -= 2)
be16_to_cpus((u16 *)p);
This removes the side-effect of be16_to_cpus(), which means that the
change to p is moved back into the for statement; After all, the for
construct has three code blocks for a reason!
I just wonder what would happen if be16_to_cpus(x) evaluated 'x' more
than once... it would be difficult to find problems introduced if this
happened as it would fail to hang, just not do the 'right' thing...
> But yes, I applied David's patch, but I _also_ suspect that we would be
> better off without code that does horrid things like casts and assignments
> inside the function arguments.
>
> So it would be nice to re-code that loop to be more readable. But due to
> the reliance of 'p' being 's' after the loop, the minimal patch would be
> something like the appended.
As noted above, I don't have any problems with the looping going backwards,
just the problems with potential side-effects.
> Bartlomiej - take this or not, I'm not going to commit it - I haven't
> tested it, nor do I even have any machines that would trigger it. So this
> is more a "maybe something like this" than anything else.
>
> Linus
>
> ---
> drivers/ide/ide-iops.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> index 8aae917..ae03151 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-iops.c
> @@ -506,14 +506,16 @@ void ide_fix_driveid (struct hd_driveid *id)
>
> void ide_fixstring (u8 *s, const int bytecount, const int byteswap)
> {
> - u8 *p = s, *end = &s[bytecount & ~1]; /* bytecount must be even */
> + u8 *p, *end = &s[bytecount & ~1]; /* bytecount must be even */
>
> if (byteswap) {
> /* convert from big-endian to host byte order */
> - for (p = end ; p != s;)
> - be16_to_cpus((u16 *)(p -= 2));
> + for (p = s ; p != end ; p += 2)
> + be16_to_cpus((u16 *) p);
> }
> +
> /* strip leading blanks */
> + p = s;
> while (s != end && *s == ' ')
> ++s;
> /* compress internal blanks and strip trailing blanks */
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/