Re: [PATCH] wait_task_inactive: don't consider task->nivcsw
From: Roland McGrath
Date: Sun Jul 27 2008 - 15:55:33 EST
> If wait_task_inactive() returns success the task was deactivated.
> In that case schedule() always increments ->nvcsw which alone can
> be used as a "generation counter".
Thanks, that looks fine to me.
> Q: perhaps it is better to do "ncsw = (p->nvcsw << 1) | 1" ? This
> decreases the possibility of "was it unscheduled" false positive
> when ->nvcsw == 0.
That makes sense.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/