Re: x86 tracehook

[Ingo Molnar]

* Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi!  The generic tracehook patches were merged, so now the arch stuff 
> can go in any time.  These are the pending x86 changes.  The only 
> difference from what I posted before are fixing up some tiny syntax 
> nits in syscall.h that made gcc-3.x unhappy.
> 
> Sorry Ingo, I had already done this with git-rebase before I read your 
> admonition about that today.  (Anyway, the prerequisite tracehook 
> series went in via patches rather than a GIT merge, so I don't think 
> the x86/tracehook branch forked from my own tracehook branch could 
> still have been used.)

that's OK. It only gets painful once someone starts relying on a branch.

> The following changes since commit 8be1a6d6c77ab4532e4476fdb8177030ef48b52c:
>   Linus Torvalds (1):
>         Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../roland/infiniband
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frob/linux-2.6-utrace.git x86-tracehook
> 
> Roland McGrath (6):
>       x86: tracehook_signal_handler
>       x86: tracehook syscall
>       x86: tracehook: asm/syscall.h
>       x86 signals: use asm/syscall.h
>       x86: tracehook: TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
>       x86: tracehook: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK

pulled into tip/x86/tracehook - thanks Roland!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/