On 7/28/08, Simon Arlott <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 28/07/08 18:05, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 7/28/08, Simon Arlott <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Just because anyone can grep the kernel log for email addresses [to
send
> > spam to], doesn't mean that you need to do it for them.
> >
>
> You need to be in the file since you have submitted patches using three
aliases.
>
No, I've submitted patches using three email addresses (well, two - one is
a typo).
That's the whole point of this list. When you submit patches in the
future we can check your name/email against the list and flag it if it
isn't there. That will alert you that you've made a typo.
A later version of this list could separate the valid current
names/addresses from the entries that are fixing typos or that have
old emails. That would improve the validation. But I don't have an
automated way to tell me which alias is the current one. Access to the
current LKML subscriber list would supply the needed info as to which
one to pick.