Re: [PATCH 2/2] lguest: use get_user_pages_fast() instead of get_user_pages()
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Wed Jul 30 2008 - 02:53:25 EST
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 15:30:10 Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 14:39, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Before: 5.93 seconds
> > After: 5.40 seconds
> >
> > (Counts of slow vs fastpath in this usage are 6092 and 2852462
> > respectively.)
> >
> > And more importantly for lguest, the code is simpler.
>
> Cool. That's actually a fairly significant straight-line performance
> improvement, given that the lguest processes are running one-at-a-time
> right? (and not contending on the locks or bouncing cachelines too much)
Yep. I mean, the performance is abysmal either way (native for this is about
10x faster), but it would be interesting to see kvm numbers as they have a
more sophisticated shadow page table setup. Not as trivial as lguest since
they seem to use the mm sem to protect other things...
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/