Re: [PATCH] madvise: update function comment of madvise_dontneed

[Christoph Lameter]

Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> diff -urNp linux-2.6.26/mm/madvise.c linux-2.6.26-fixes/mm/madvise.c
> --- linux-2.6.26/mm/madvise.c	2008-07-14 06:51:29.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.26-fixes/mm/madvise.c	2008-07-28 19:53:27.000000000 +0900
> @@ -132,10 +132,10 @@ static long madvise_willneed(struct vm_a
>   * Application no longer needs these pages.  If the pages are dirty,
>   * it's OK to just throw them away.  The app will be more careful about
>   * data it wants to keep.  Be sure to free swap resources too.  The
> - * zap_page_range call sets things up for refill_inactive to actually free
> + * zap_page_range call sets things up for shrink_active_list to actually free
>   * these pages later if no one else has touched them in the meantime,
>   * although we could add these pages to a global reuse list for
> - * refill_inactive to pick up before reclaiming other pages.
> + * shrink_active_list to pick up before reclaiming other pages.
>   *
>   * NB: This interface discards data rather than pushes it out to swap,
>   * as some implementations do.  This has performance implications for
> 
> 

Well shrink_page_list actually does the freeing of the pages.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/