On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 09:25 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
Index: linux-2.6/fs/jbd/transaction.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/jbd/transaction.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/jbd/transaction.c
@@ -63,6 +65,32 @@ get_transaction(journal_t *journal, tran
return transaction;
}
+static void precision_sleep(unsigned long time)
+{
+ struct hrtimer_sleeper t;
+
+ hrtimer_init_on_stack(&t.timer, CLOCK_REALTIME, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+ hrtimer_init_sleeper(&t, current);
+ t.timer.expires = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get_real(), time);
+
+ do {
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+
+ hrtimer_start(&t.timer, t.timer.expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+ if (!hrtimer_active(&t.timer))
+ t.task = NULL;
+
+ if (likely(t.task))
+ schedule();
+
+ hrtimer_cancel(&t.timer);
+ } while (t.task);
+
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
+ destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&t.timer);
+}
+
/*
* Handle management.
*
I was convinced we already had such a creature,. but I guess I was wrong
as I can't find it ;-)
Anyway, I'm thinking this function ought to live in kernel/hrtimer.c and
possibly get renamed to something like hrtimer_sleep_ns() or some such
(means you can also reuse the do_nanosleep helper in there).
Also, have you considered the impact on platforms that do not support
hrtimers, or don't have high resolution clock events available?
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/hrtimer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -1458,6 +1458,7 @@ void hrtimer_init_sleeper(struct hrtimer
sl->timer.cb_mode = HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ;
#endif
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hrtimer_init_sleeper);
static int __sched do_nanosleep(struct hrtimer_sleeper *t, enum hrtimer_mode mode)
{
That also gets rid of this export..