Re: ftrace introduces instability into kernel 2.6.27(-rc2,-rc3)

From: Scott Wood
Date: Mon Aug 18 2008 - 14:34:54 EST


Steven Rostedt wrote:
Should use a "b" constraint for %2, or you could get r0.

I will make an updated patch.

Or, use an "m"
constraint with %U2%X2 after the lwz/stw.

The 'b' seems easier ;-)

The advantage of the latter is that it allows GCC to choose indexed or update instructions -- but that's merely an optimization. Switching to "b" is enough to avoid the potential bug.

%1 also needs to be an early clobber.

Not exactly sure what you mean by the above.

%1 is written to before some inputs are consumed, so you need to use "=&r" rather than "=r" so that GCC won't use the same register for both.

-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/