Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushesto use function calls [POST 2]

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Tue Aug 19 2008 - 03:44:18 EST


Andi Kleen wrote:
>> nice stuff!
>>
>
> If only those 35% wouldn't be there ...
>

Don't pay attention to that number. It's only the extra latency of a HT
context->HT context function call + tlb flush. Which means 1) the tlb
is shared anyway, so the extra flush is redundant, 2) they're not really
concurrent, 3) it's going down the single-cpu call, rather than the
multi-cpu one, 4) it's only measuring the latency for a particular tlb
flush, and doesn't take into account any throughput improvements the
extra queueing may add.

I don't really know what the nett consequence of all that is, but it
means the number has almost no bearing on multicore results, esp with >2
cores.

J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/