Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> > +#if 0
> >         if (!s->remote_node_defrag_ratio ||
> >                         get_cycles() % 1024 > s->remote_node_defrag_ratio)
> >                 return NULL;
> > +#endif
> > 
> >         zonelist = node_zonelist(slab_node(current->mempolicy), flags);
> >         for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx) {
> 
> Hmmm.... So always take from partial lists works? That is the same effect that
> the setting of the remote_defrag_ratio to 100 should have had (its multiplied
> by 10 when storing it).

Sorry, I don't know reason.
OK, I'll digg it more.

> So its a NUMA only phenomenon. How is performance affected?

Unfortunately, I can't mesure it.

because
   - Fujitsu server can access remote node fastly than typical numa server.
     So, my performance number often isn't typical.
   - My box (4G x2node) is very small in NUMA machine.
     but that is large server improving mechanism.

IOW, My box didn't happend performance regression.
but I think it isn't typical.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/