Re: [PATCH 1/5] Revert "kmemtrace: fix printk format warnings"

[Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:51:32AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> 
> > This reverts commit 79cf3d5e207243eecb1c4331c569e17700fa08fa.
> > 
> > The reverted commit, while it fixed printk format warnings, it resulted in
> > marker-probe format mismatches. Another approach should be used to fix
> > these warnings.
> 
> Such as what?
> 
> Can marker probes be fixed instead?
> 
> After seeing & fixing lots of various warnings in the last few days,
> I'm thinking that people don't look at/heed warnings nowadays.  Sad.
> Maybe there are just so many that they are lost in the noise.

Hi,

Check the next patch in the series, it provides the alternate fix.
I favor this approach more because it involves fewer changes and we
don't have to use things like "%zu" (which make data type size less
apparent).


	Cheers,
	Eduard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/