Re: [GIT]: Networking
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Aug 19 2008 - 16:48:21 EST
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, David Miller wrote:
>
> The BT bits were the only part I really considered borderline,
> and I was going to push back on Marcel.
I really don't see the e1000 and netxen updates as being critical either.
Sure, they look like driver improvement, but "improvement" is not what the
-rc3+ series is about.
Same goes for all the loopback changes. They look like cleanups or feature
enables.
IOW, it all looks like good commits, but quite a _lot_ of that queue looks
like good commits that should happen during the merge window, not during
the stabilization phase.
And this is by no means unique to _this_ pull request. It's been a very
clear pattern for a long time now. The networking area tends to be one of
the absolutely *most* active ones during the post-rc1 phase.
[ Yeah, in all fairness some architectures also do that, but at least I
feel like I _really_ don't need to care when I get a diffstat that only
touches arch/sh/* or something like that. ]
> But to be honest, I haven't seen bluetooth updates from him
> for such a long time I felt that being strict here would just
> exacerbate the problem.
I pointed out the BT ones as standing out (they were larger than some of
the other patches too), but I really don't think this was in any way
limited to BT in any shape, form or color. Quite frankly, looking through
the thing, my gut feel is that about _half_ the commits over-all should
probably have been in the queue for the next release.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/