Re: slower initcalls in -next

[Daniel Walker]

On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 09:58 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> At least, all alsa_* calls are only for ISA devices, and I don't think
> it's worth to optimize.  Changing such hardcoded delays could break
> the running system easily.
> 
> However, some of the above are definitely interesting to investigate
> as they are mostly built-in and affect almost all people.

I didn't realize it till later , but the list is a little misleading ..
Those times are a mix of execution, and blocking.. I think the top one
(49 seconds!) was blocked most of the time, since ub_init() doesn't look
very complex. I'm not sure if it what it was blocked on, or why ..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/