Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic.

[Robin Holt]

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:13:32PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:10:47AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > Hi Cristoph,
> > > 
> > > Thank you for explain your quicklist plan at OLS.
> > > 
> > > So, I made summary to issue of quicklist.
> > > if you have a bit time, Could you please read this mail and patches?
> > > And, if possible, Could you please tell me your feeling?
> > 
> > I believe what I said at the OLS was that quicklists are fundamentally crappy
> > and should be replaced by something that works (Guess that is what you meant
> > by "plan"?). Quicklists were generalized from the IA64 arch code.
> > 
> > Good fixup but I would think that some more radical rework is needed.
> > 
> > Maybe some of this needs to vanish into the TLB handling logic?
> > 
> > Then I have thought for awhile that the main reason that quicklists exist are
> > the performance problems in the page allocator. If you can make the single
> > page alloc / free pass competitive in performance with quicklists then we
> > could get rid of all uses.
> 
> It is more than the free/alloc cycle, the quicklist saves us from
> having to zero the page.  In a sparsely filled page table, it saves time
> and cache footprint.  In a heavily used page table, you end up with a
> near wash.
> 
> One problem I see is somebody got rid of the node awareness.  We used
> to not put pages onto a quicklist when they were being released from a
> different node than the cpu is on.  Not sure where that went.  It was
> done because of the trap page problem described here.

Poorly worded.  Here is the code I am referring to:

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
        unsigned long nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(pgtable_entry));

        if (unlikely(nid != numa_node_id())) {
                free_page((unsigned long)pgtable_entry);
                return;
        }
#endif

Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/