Re: ftraced and suspend to ram

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, 22 of August 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > Does ftrace hook itself onto _all_ the functions? Or all .c functions?
> 
> It hooks into all .c functions that are not annotated with "notrace"
> or the files have not been marked in the Makefile like:
> 
>   CFLAGS_REMOVE_<file>.o = -pg
> 
> 
> > 
> > I guess low-level suspend code needs to be exempt from
> > tracing. Certainly all the assembly functions.
> 
> I'm looking into that now too. Are the functions in arch/x86/power/cpu*.c 
> the suspend to ram code?

They contain code executed during suspend to RAM, but such code is also:
- in all files under arch/x86/kernel/acpi/
- in main.c, console.c under kernel/power
- in all files under drivers/acpi/sleep
- in drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c

Generally, ACPI is heavily involved and I'm not the right person to ask which
of the ACPI functions should get the 'notrace' thing.  Also, I'm not sure about
the device drivers' ->suspend() and ->resume() callbacks, especially for
sysdevs and ->suspend_late(), ->resume_early() for platform devices and PCI.

Well, how exactly suspend to RAM is broken by ftrace?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/