Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression

[Yinghai Lu]

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Rufus & Azrael
> <rufus-azrael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> cat /proc/timer_list
>>>
>>
>> see file attached.
>>
> ..
>>
>> Tick Device: mode:     1
>> Clock Event Device: hpet
>>  max_delta_ns:   149983003520
>>  min_delta_ns:   3352
>>  mult:           61496115
>>  shift:          32
>>  mode:           3
>>  next_event:     9223372036854775807 nsecs
>>  set_next_event: hpet_legacy_next_event
>>  set_mode:       hpet_legacy_set_mode
>>  event_handler:  tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast
>> tick_broadcast_mask: 00000000
>> tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask: 00000000
>>
>
> thanks
>
> so it works..., need to find out where is the magic bit.
>

Jordan, or others for AMD could access SB600
can you check ATI SB600 doc to produce one quirks patch to set the
magic bit to hide 00:14.0 BAR1 to OS ?

Tthanks

Yinghai Lu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/