Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay

[Atsushi Nemoto]

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:44:47 +0100, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So, if rescheduling was dangerous here, we already have potential
> > problems, no?
> 
> Yes we do but I didn't manage to stop the other mistakes getting in when
> they did. If you take a schedule you get results back from the probe_irq
> that tend to suck in other random ISA device events (ISA being edge
> triggered nobody was ever careful about spurious irq)

OK, I see your point.  Thanks.

---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/