Re: [PATCH 4/5 ver2] rt2x00: Compiler warning unmasked by fix of BUILD_BUG_ON

[Ivo Van Doorn]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A "Set" of a sign-bit in an "&" operation causes a compiler warning.
> Make calculations unsigned.
>
> [ The warning was masked by the use of (void)() cast in the old
>  BUILD_BUG_ON() ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> TO: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx>
> TO: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h
> index 7e88ce5..e71b793 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h
> @@ -136,8 +136,8 @@ struct rt2x00_field32 {
>  */
>  #define is_power_of_two(x)     ( !((x) & ((x)-1)) )
>  #define low_bit_mask(x)                ( ((x)-1) & ~(x) )
> -#define is_valid_mask(x)       is_power_of_two(1 + (x) + low_bit_mask(x))
> -
> +#define is_valid_mask(x)       is_power_of_two(1 + (x) + \
> +                                       low_bit_mask((unsigned long)x))

I know I typed it wrong, but you are missing the unsigned long cast for the
is_power_of_two argument here (Which could also be done in the
is_valid_mask() definition).

>  /*
>  * Macro's to find first set bit in a variable.
>  * These macro's behaves the same as the __ffs() function with
> --
> 1.5.6.rc1.5.gadf6
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/