Re: [PATCH 4/5 ver2] rt2x00: Compiler warning unmasked by fix of BUILD_BUG_ON

[Ivo van Doorn]

> From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:47:19 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: Compiler warning unmasked by fix of BUILD_BUG_ON
> 
> A "Set" to a sign-bit in an "&" operation causes a compiler warning.
> Make calculations unsigned.
> 
> [ The warning was masked by the old definition of BUILD_BUG_ON() ]
> 
> Also remove __builtin_constant_p from FIELD_CHECK since BUILD_BUG_ON
> no longer permits non-const values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> TO: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx>
> TO: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h
> index 7e88ce5..2ea7866 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00reg.h
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct rt2x00_field32 {
>   */
>  #define is_power_of_two(x)	( !((x) & ((x)-1)) )
>  #define low_bit_mask(x)		( ((x)-1) & ~(x) )
> -#define is_valid_mask(x)	is_power_of_two(1 + (x) + low_bit_mask(x))
> +#define is_valid_mask(x)	is_power_of_two(1LU + (x) + low_bit_mask(x))
>  
>  /*
>   * Macro's to find first set bit in a variable.
> @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ struct rt2x00_field32 {
>   * does not exceed the given typelimit.
>   */
>  #define FIELD_CHECK(__mask, __type)			\
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(__mask) ||	\
> -		     !(__mask) ||			\
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(!(__mask) ||			\
>  		     !is_valid_mask(__mask) ||		\
>  		     (__mask) != (__type)(__mask))	\
>  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/