[patch 07/16] forcedeth: fix checksum flag
From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Sep 03 2008 - 13:51:31 EST
2.6.25-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit edcfe5f7e307846e578fb88d69fa27051fded0ab upstream
Fix the checksum feature advertised in device flags. The hardware support
TCP/UDP over IPv4 and TCP/UDP over IPv6 (without IPv6 extension headers).
However, the kernel feature flags do not distinguish IPv6 with/without
extension headers.
Therefore, the driver needs to use NETIF_F_IP_CSUM instead of
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM since the latter includes all IPv6 packets.
A future patch can be created to check for extension headers and perform
software checksum calculation.
Signed-off-by: Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/forcedeth.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
@@ -5249,7 +5249,7 @@ static int __devinit nv_probe(struct pci
if (id->driver_data & DEV_HAS_CHECKSUM) {
np->rx_csum = 1;
np->txrxctl_bits |= NVREG_TXRXCTL_RXCHECK;
- dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
+ dev->features |= NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
dev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO;
}
@@ -5548,7 +5548,7 @@ static int __devinit nv_probe(struct pci
dev_printk(KERN_INFO, &pci_dev->dev, "%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%sdesc-v%u\n",
dev->features & NETIF_F_HIGHDMA ? "highdma " : "",
- dev->features & (NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG) ?
+ dev->features & (NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG) ?
"csum " : "",
dev->features & (NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX) ?
"vlan " : "",
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/