Re: [PATCH 5/6] Added flush_disk to factor out common buffer cache flushing code.
From: Jeff Moyer
Date: Thu Sep 04 2008 - 09:50:32 EST
Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:19 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Added flush_disk to factor out common buffer cache flushing code.
>> >
>> > We need to be able to flush the buffer cache for for more than
>> > just when a disk is changed, so we factor out common cache flush code
>> > in check_disk_change() to an internal flush_disk() routine. This
>> > routine will then be used for both disk changes and disk resizes (in a
>> > later patch).
>> >
>> > Include the disk name in the text indicating that there are busy
>> > inodes on the device and increase the KERN severity of the message.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> > +static void flush_disk(struct block_device *bdev)
>> > +{
>> > + if (__invalidate_device(bdev)) {
>> > + char name[BDEVNAME_SIZE] = "";
>> > +
>> > + if (bdev->bd_disk)
>> > + disk_name(bdev->bd_disk, 0, name);
>> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "VFS: busy inodes on changed media %s\n",
>> > + name);
>> > + }
>>
>> This message will scare folks growing their devices online. Can you
>> think of some better verbiage for this?
>
> This message is shared with the check_disk_change() routine. Yes, it is
> scary, but perhaps that is to the good. We have no guarantee how the
> user changed the underlying storage. For example, they might have
> shrunk the volume below the size of an underlying file-system and then
> grew it again before kicking off the resize detection (admittedly a
> degenerate case), in which case the warning is appropriate. Any
> suggestions on better wording?
I'm not sure how verbose we want to be with printk's; it's a dilemma.
Any verbiage suggesting that strictly growing the partition is safe
would be welcome, but I agree, that's tough to convey at this point.
I guess I'm okay with things as they stand, but I do think this will
generate customer calls. ;)
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/