Re: frame unwinder patches

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:19:21 +0200
Bernd Schubert <bs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > not printing the ? would be trivial (for some backtraces we do
> > that), but so far hasn't been seen as desirable because you lose
> > information in those hard-to-debug cases when you need anything you
> > can get from the backtrace.
> 
> I see your point, but in most cases it is rather annoying.

... if you see backtraces regularly there's something wrong ;-)

(and if you really care it's 1 line of code to turn it off)


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/