Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release_* family

[Hiroshi DOYU]

From: "ext Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release_* family
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:52:54 -0700

> On Sat,  6 Sep 2008 04:00:23 +0300 Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: ext Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/ioport.h |    4 ++--
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > index 22d2115..c813c63 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ extern struct resource * __devm_request_region(struct device *dev,
> >  				struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start,
> >  				resource_size_t n, const char *name);
> >  
> > -#define devm_release_region(start,n) \
> > +#define devm_release_region(dev,start,n) \
> >  	__devm_release_region(dev, &ioport_resource, (start), (n))
> > -#define devm_release_mem_region(start,n) \
> > +#define devm_release_mem_region(dev,start,n) \
> >  	__devm_release_region(dev, &iomem_resource, (start), (n))
> >  
> >  extern void __devm_release_region(struct device *dev, struct resource *parent,
> 
> um, OK.
> 
> But none of these things appear to have any callers anywhere.  Why
> don't we just delete it all?

Not sure for others, but at least, I am using this in my developing
driver;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/