Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: check for and defend against BIOS memorycorruption

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > I would prefer you both to use the minimal memmap= solutions for 
> > now; but others may disagree.
> 
> The fact that we're seeing this problem in two completely different 
> systems with different BIOSes and everything else makes me worried 
> that this is quite widespread.  It's only the persistence and 
> diligence of our bug reporters that we managed to work out that 
> they're the same problem.  How many other people are getting strange 
> crashes and haven't managed to correlate it any particular BIOS 
> interaction?  Or just happen to be corrupting memory we don't care 
> about right now, but is only a small code change or link order change 
> away from disaster?

please put this all behind a .config debug option that distros can turn 
on/off. Also, when it's enabled in the .config, there should be another 
.config option that marks it disabled by default but it can be enabled 
via a boot parameter.

Distro debug kernels will most likely enable the .config - even release 
kernels might enable it it, with default off - users can enable the boot 
switch if they suspect something, without having to build a new kernel.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/