Re: [PATCH] shrink printk timestamp field

[Ingo Molnar]

* Joe Korty <joe.korty@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> Of course it's useful.  If you're working on performance or latency 
> >> in a disk, network or USB driver, microsecond resolution is about 
> >> right.
> >
> > I second this. If we have timestamps enables, let it be useful for 
> > all current uses. The 3 digits extra are very cheap useful 
> > information in that area (without resorting to more elaborate 
> > methods like the recently merged latency tracer).
> > 
> > Rather than cut 3 digits off, maybe fix some of the too-wide prints 
> > would solve the posters issue better.
> > 
> > Can we please have this patch non-committed or reverted?
> 
> I have no objection...

ok, i've zapped it from tip/core/printk.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/