Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Sat Sep 06 2008 - 16:59:49 EST
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> If Alok has the second check in place and is actually worried about
> that 288us impact, then we can add the following (untested), which
> does not impact the speed of the check.
Guys, please.
Show some _taste_.
Dammit, stop adding random crap to "native_calibrate_tsc()" and make it
look like total and utter SHIT.
If you want to do that
tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&ref1, hpet);
..
tsc2 = tsc_read_refs(&ref1, hpet);
around calibration and comparing it, then do it *once*. Do it over the
whole thing. Do it in a function of its own, instead of making this
horrible and unreadable mess.
This patch may be fine as a "let's check if it works" thing, but please
don't send out total SH*T to public lists.
Some _tasted_ in programming, please!
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/