Re: [RFC][PATCH] utsname: completely overwrite prior information
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Sep 12 2008 - 18:12:21 EST
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:36:24 +0200
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >From 25c69de4760e20cf7562cf92a55b65a71546093e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:59:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] utsname: completely overwrite prior information
>
> On sethostname() and setdomainname(), previous information may be
> retained if it was longer than than the new hostname/domainname.
>
> This can be demonstrated trivially by calling sethostname() first
> with a long name, then with a short name, and then calling uname()
> to retrieve the full buffer that contains the hostname (and
> possibly parts of the old hostname), one just has to look past the
> terminating zero.
>
> I don't know if we should really care that much (hence the RFC);
> the only scenarios I can possibly think of is administrator
> putting something sensitive in the hostname (or domain name) by
> accident, and changing it back will not undo the mistake entirely,
> though it's not like we can recover gracefully from "rm -rf /"
> either... The other scenario is namespaces (CLONE_NEWUTS) where
> some information may be unintentionally "inherited" from the
> previous namespace (a program wants to hide the original name and
> does clone + sethostname, but some information is still left).
>
> I think the patch may be defended on grounds of the principle of
> least surprise. But I am not adamant :-)
>
> (I guess the question now is whether userspace should be able to
> write embedded NULs into the buffer or not...)
>
> At least the observation has been made and the patch has been
> presented.
>
fair enuf. Did you check allthe other fields in 'struct new_utsname'?
> index 038a7bc..78b4515 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -1352,7 +1352,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sethostname(char __user *name, int len)
> errno = -EFAULT;
> if (!copy_from_user(tmp, name, len)) {
> memcpy(utsname()->nodename, tmp, len);
> - utsname()->nodename[len] = 0;
> + memset(utsname()->nodename + len, 0,
> + sizeof(utsname()->nodename) - len);
We could do the memset before the memcpy. It's more work, but less
text. Whatever.
While we're there, the code generation in there is a bit sloppy. How's
this look?
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
utsname() is quite expensive to calculate. Cache it in a local.
text data bss dec hex filename
before: 11136 720 16 11872 2e60 kernel/sys.o
after: 11096 720 16 11832 2e38 kernel/sys.o
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sys.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/sys.c~kernel-sysc-improve-code-generation kernel/sys.c
--- a/kernel/sys.c~kernel-sysc-improve-code-generation
+++ a/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1415,9 +1415,10 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sethostname(char __u
down_write(&uts_sem);
errno = -EFAULT;
if (!copy_from_user(tmp, name, len)) {
- memcpy(utsname()->nodename, tmp, len);
- memset(utsname()->nodename + len, 0,
- sizeof(utsname()->nodename) - len);
+ struct new_utsname *u = utsname();
+
+ memcpy(u->nodename, tmp, len);
+ memset(u->nodename + len, 0, sizeof(u->nodename) - len);
errno = 0;
}
up_write(&uts_sem);
@@ -1429,15 +1430,17 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sethostname(char __u
asmlinkage long sys_gethostname(char __user *name, int len)
{
int i, errno;
+ struct new_utsname *u;
if (len < 0)
return -EINVAL;
down_read(&uts_sem);
- i = 1 + strlen(utsname()->nodename);
+ u = utsname();
+ i = 1 + strlen(u->nodename);
if (i > len)
i = len;
errno = 0;
- if (copy_to_user(name, utsname()->nodename, i))
+ if (copy_to_user(name, u->nodename, i))
errno = -EFAULT;
up_read(&uts_sem);
return errno;
@@ -1462,9 +1465,10 @@ asmlinkage long sys_setdomainname(char _
down_write(&uts_sem);
errno = -EFAULT;
if (!copy_from_user(tmp, name, len)) {
- memcpy(utsname()->domainname, tmp, len);
- memset(utsname()->domainname + len, 0,
- sizeof(utsname()->domainname) - len);
+ struct new_utsname *u = utsname();
+
+ memcpy(u->domainname, tmp, len);
+ memset(u->domainname + len, 0, sizeof(u->domainname) - len);
errno = 0;
}
up_write(&uts_sem);
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/