Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus pristine tree)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote:
> > > I just had another incident where it disassociated and refused to
> > > reassociate. I got about 100 of these in my dmesg (fixed by unloading
> > > and reloading ath9k):
> > 
> > Is this a regression from 2.6.26?
> > 
> 
> ath9k has been recently introduced (i.e. it's new to 2.6.27). So I'm not 
> certain how to answer. Correct me if I'm wrong but a regression is a new  
> bug for a specific component that did not surface in the previous release, 
> correct?

Yes.

> But if the component didn't exist in the previous version, is it still a
> regression? 

No, it isn't considered as a regression.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/