Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't use NOPL on 32-bit cpu's because not all systems support it.

[David Sanders]

On Tuesday 16 September 2008 12:32, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Oh good grief.
>
> VPC is apparently so broken that these instructions work *some* of the
> time, which may include the first time, but not later. ÂThat is an
> impressive level of cockup.
>
> Given that, we should either just rip this code out, or detect VPC
> (how?). ÂThe latter option can be done post-.27, of course; if so, we
> should just force the bit off for now rather than doing it in the
> alternatives code. ÂThe only reason for doing the latter at all would be
> to mitigate the overhead of paravirt_ops and other dynamic patch sites.
>
> It would also be the least impact for .27, I believe.

I think you still want the nopl enabled for 64-bits.

This is how I detect virtual pc.  I based it on a google search.  Microsoft 
itself provides no info:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void except(int e)
{
	printf("Not in Virtual PC\n");
	exit(1);
}

int main()
{
	signal(SIGILL, except);
	asm("\n"
		"mov $0x01, %eax\n" /* function number */
		".byte 0x0f, 0x3f, 0x07, 0x0b\n" /* call VPC */
	   );
	printf("Inside Virtual PC\n");
	return 0;
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/