Re: [PATCH 1/2] Report the pagesize backing a VMA in /proc/pid/smaps

[Mel Gorman]

On (24/09/08 09:06), Dave Hansen didst pronounce:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:41 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > I admit it's ppc64-specific. In the latest patch series, I made this a
> > separate patch so that it could be readily dropped again for this reason.
> > Maybe an alternative would be to display MMUPageSize *only* where it differs
> > from KernelPageSize. Would that be better or similarly confusing?
> 
> I would also think that any arch implementing fallback from large to
> small pages in a hugetlbfs area (Adam needs to post his patches :) would
> also use this.
> 

Fair point. Maybe the thing to do is backburner this patch for the moment and
reintroduce it when/if an architecture supports demotion? The KernelPageSize
reporting in smaps and what the hpagesize in maps is still useful though
I believe. Any comment?

(future stuff from here on)

In the future if demotion does happen then the MMUPageSize information may
be genuinely useful instead of just a curious oddity on ppc64. As you point
out, Adam (added to cc) has worked on this area (starting with x86 demotion)
in the past but it's a while before it'll be considered for merging I believe.

That aside, more would need to be done with the page size reporting then
anyway. For example, it maybe indicate how much of each pagesize is in a VMA
or indicate that KernelPageSize is what is being requested but in reality
it is mixed like;

KernelPageSize:		2048 kB (mixed)

or

KernelPageSize:		2048 kB * 5, 4096 kB * 20


-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/