Re: [NET-NEXT PATCH] e1000: remove unused Kconfig option for disablingpacket split

[Jeff Garzik]

Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Since the e1000/e1000e split, no hardware supported by e1000
> > > supports packet split, just remove the Kconfig option and associated
> > > code from arch/* and the driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  arch/arm/configs/iop13xx_defconfig              |    1
> > > arch/arm/configs/iop32x_defconfig               |    1
> > ACK, except for the defconfig changes.  arch maintainers usually prefer to do
> > that themselves.
> >
> > We'd be continually patch defconfig files, if we did so every time it was
> > likely one would be updated by a Kconfig patch.
>
> Here is an updated patch without the defconfig changes
>
> == cut here ==
>
> e1000: remove Kconfig option for packet split and e1000 related code
>
> From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Since the e1000/e1000e split, no hardware supported by e1000
> supports packet split, just remove the Kconfig option and associated
> code from the driver.
>
> reposted without the defconfig changes, should apply to net-next
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/Kconfig            |    9 -
>  drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h      |   17 --
>  drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c |  416 +---------------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 433 deletions(-)

applied


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/