Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Thu Sep 25 2008 - 13:21:12 EST


* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > The problem with sched_clock is that it gives a 1 HZ timestamp accuracy
> > for events happening across different CPUs. Within this 1 HZ range, it
> > uses the TSC and clip when it reaches a max. Good enough for scheduler
> > or for tracing events on a single CPU, but I think it is not exactly
> > what we need to reorder events happening across CPUs.
> >
>
>
> Hmm,
>
> sched_clock gives ns accuracy unless the tsc is disabled. And in that
> case, we don't have any CPU clock :-/
>

Even on architectures with non-synchronized TSCs ?

Mathieu

>
> -- Steve
>

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/