Yes, it is.
...
@@ -1094,7 +1103,7 @@ static int __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct sock *sk;
int dif;
- read_lock(&udp_hash_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
sk = sk_head(&udptable[udp_hashfn(net, ntohs(uh->dest))]);
Probably sk_head_rcu() is needed too.
It also needs sk_next_rcu(). sk_unhashed() is only used on the update side, so an rcu version is not needed there.dif = skb->dev->ifindex;...
sk = udp_v4_mcast_next(sk, uh->dest, daddr, uh->source, saddr, dif);
@@ -1120,7 +1129,7 @@ static int __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
} while (sknext);
} else
kfree_skb(skb);
- read_unlock(&udp_hash_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
Aren't other functions like sk_next() or sk_unhashed() used on the
read side and need _rcu versions?