Re: [PATCH 7/12] memcg add function to move account
From: Daisuke Nishimura
Date: Fri Sep 26 2008 - 04:15:29 EST
> @@ -444,9 +445,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *
>
> pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
> if (pc) {
> + mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
> - __mem_cgroup_move_lists(pc, lru);
> + /*
> + * check against the race with move_account.
> + */
> + if (likely(mem == pc->mem_cgroup))
> + __mem_cgroup_move_lists(pc, lru);
(snip)
> @@ -754,16 +824,24 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
> if ((ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED)
> && ((PageCgroupCache(pc) || page_mapped(page))))
> goto unlock;
> -
> +retry:
> + mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
> + if (ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED &&
> + unlikely(mem != pc->mem_cgroup)) {
> + /* MAPPED account can be done without lock_page().
> + Check race with mem_cgroup_move_account() */
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
> + goto retry;
> + }
I'm sorry, but I've not been convinced yet why these checks are needed here.
(Those checks are removed by [9/12] anyway.)
IIUC, pc->mem_cgroup is moved to another group only by mem_cgroup_move_account
under lock_page_cgroup( and mz->lru_lock).
And those two above(mem_cgroup_move_lists and __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common) sets
mem = pc->mem_cgroup under lock_page_cgroup, so I don't think those checks
(mem != pc->mem_cgroup) is needed.
Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
> +/**
> + * mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
> + * @page ... the target page of being moved.
> + * @pc ... page_cgroup of the page.
> + * @from ... mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
> + * @to ... mem_cgroup which the page is moved to.
> + *
> + * The caller must confirm following.
> + * 1. disable irq.
> + * 2. lru_lock of old mem_cgroup should be held.
> + * 3. pc is guaranteed to be valid and on mem_cgroup's LRU.
> + *
> + * Because we cannot call try_to_free_page() here, the caller must guarantee
> + * this moving of charge never fails. (if charge fails, this call fails.)
> + * Currently this is called only against root cgroup.
> + * which has no limitation of resource.
> + * Returns 0 at success, returns 1 at failure.
> + */
> +int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page, struct page_cgroup *pc,
> + struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz;
> + int nid, zid;
> + int ret = 1;
> +
> + VM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> +
> + nid = page_to_nid(page);
> + zid = page_zonenum(page);
> + from_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(from, nid, zid);
> + to_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(to, nid, zid);
> +
> + if (res_counter_charge(&to->res, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + /* Now, we assume no_limit...no failure here. */
> + return ret;
> + }
> + if (!try_lock_page_cgroup(page)) {
> + res_counter_uncharge(&to->res, PAGE_SIZE);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (page_get_page_cgroup(page) != pc) {
> + res_counter_uncharge(&to->res, PAGE_SIZE);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (spin_trylock(&to_mz->lru_lock)) {
> + __mem_cgroup_remove_list(from_mz, pc);
> + css_put(&from->css);
> + res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE);
> + pc->mem_cgroup = to;
> + css_get(&to->css);
> + __mem_cgroup_add_list(to_mz, pc);
> + ret = 0;
> + spin_unlock(&to_mz->lru_lock);
> + } else {
> + res_counter_uncharge(&to->res, PAGE_SIZE);
> + }
> +out:
> + unlock_page_cgroup(page);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Charge the memory controller for page usage.
> * Return
> __mem_cgroup_remove_list(mz, pc);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
>
> page_assign_page_cgroup(page, NULL);
> unlock_page_cgroup(page);
>
> - mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> +
> res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
> css_put(&mem->css);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/