Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86/iommu: use dma_ops_list in get_dma_ops

[Amit Shah]

* On Friday 26 Sep 2008 14:29:24 Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 01:26:19PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > * On Monday 22 Sep 2008 23:51:21 Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > This patch enables stackable dma_ops on x86. To do this, it also
> > > enables the per-device dma_ops on i386.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c     |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/asm-x86/device.h      |    6 +++---
> > >  include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h |   14 +++++++-------
> > >  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > > index b990fb6..2e517c2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > > @@ -82,6 +82,32 @@ void x86_register_dma_ops(struct dma_mapping_ops
> > > *ops, write_unlock_irqrestore(&dma_ops_list_lock, flags);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +struct dma_mapping_ops *find_dma_ops_for_device(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	int i;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +	struct dma_mapping_ops *entry, *ops = NULL;
> > > +
> > > +	read_lock_irqsave(&dma_ops_list_lock, flags);
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < DMA_OPS_TYPE_MAX; ++i)
> > > +		list_for_each_entry(entry, &dma_ops_list[i], list) {
> > > +			if (!entry->device_supported)
> > > +				continue;
> > > +			if (entry->device_supported(dev)) {
> > > +				ops = entry;
> > > +				goto out;
> > > +			}
> > > +		}
> > > +out:
> > > +	read_unlock_irqrestore(&dma_ops_list_lock, flags);
> >
> > For PVDMA, we want the "native" dma_ops to succeed first, eg, nommu, and
> > then do our "PV DMA", which is just translating gpa  to hpa and then
> > program the hardware. This isn't being done here. This can be done by
> > extending the return type:
> >
> > DMA_DEV_NOT_SUPPORTED
> > DMA_DEV_HANDLED
> > DMA_DEV_PASS
> >
> > Where NOT_SUPPORTED means we should look for the next one in the chain
> > (current return value 0), DEV_HANDLED means the dma operation has been
> > handled successfully (current return value 1) and DEV_PASS means fall
> > back to the next layer and then return back.
>
> I am not sure I fully understand what you mean? Why do we need to call
> nommu handlers first for PVDMA devices?

For the usual dma_alloc_coherent, dma_map_single, etc. routines. They return 
the gpa to the driver. We want to intercept this gpa and convert it to the 
hpa before passing on the value to the driver. So our dma_alloc_coherent will 
assume the real underlying alloc_coherent has succeeded and then make a 
hypercall.

The PV dma_ops routines won't do the usual allocation, etc. that's already 
done elsewhere.

> I think that PVDMA devices must always be handled by a pv-dma_ops
> implementation. So it makes more sense for me to assign the the dma_ops
> of this implementation to the per-device dma_ops structure when we do
> the first call to the dma api. So we pay this overhead of finding out
> who is responsible only once and not at every call to the dma api.
>
> Joerg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/