Re: 2.6.27-rc7-sha1: EIP at proc_sys_compare+0x36/0x50
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Sep 26 2008 - 11:48:12 EST
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> Gentlemen, this happened while script was slowly rebuilding 300+ configs
> sequentially. Very little recompling activity itself, much seeking.
>
> This is first time I see this. No debugging was on, no preemption.
>
> Version: 2.6.27-rc7-c0f4d6d4b14a75a341d972ff73fb9740e1ceb634 +
> atl1 fixlet + "notes" kobject fixlet, but they don't matter.
>
> ffffffff802bc690 <proc_sys_compare>:
....
> ffffffff802bc6c0: 75 dd jne ffffffff802bc69f <proc_sys_compare+0xf>
> ffffffff802bc6c2: 49 8b 40 e0 mov -0x20(%r8),%rax
> ffffffff802bc6c6: ===> 48 8b 78 f0 mov -0x10(%rax),%rdi <===
> ffffffff802bc6ca: e8 71 96 f7 ff callq ffffffff80235d40 <sysctl_is_seen>
That would be the
sysctl_is_seen(PROC_I(dentry->d_inode)->sysctl)
call, and it really looks like 'dentry->d_inode' is NULL:
> [16526.029537] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffff0
The whole PROC_I() thing just offsets from the inode:
container_of(inode, struct proc_inode, vfs_inode);
and 'sysctl' is indeed 16 bytes below the vfs inode on x86-64:
struct proc_inode {
...
struct ctl_table_header *sysctl;
struct ctl_table *sysctl_entry;
struct inode vfs_inode;
};
and as far as I can tell, there is nothing to say that a /proc inode
cannot be a negative dentry. Sure, we try to get rid of them, but during a
parallel lookup, we will have added the dentry with a NULL inode in the
other lookup.
So assuming that you have an inode at that point seems to be utter crap.
Now, the whole _function_ is utter crap and should probably be dropped,
but whatever. That's just another sysctl insanity. In the meantime,
something like this does look appropriate, no?
Al, did I miss something?
Linus
---
fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index f9a8b89..9435fd0 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static int proc_sys_compare(struct dentry *dir, struct qstr *qstr,
return 1;
if (memcmp(qstr->name, name->name, name->len))
return 1;
+ if (!dentry->d_inode)
+ return 1;
return !sysctl_is_seen(PROC_I(dentry->d_inode)->sysctl);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/