Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Sep 26 2008 - 15:15:28 EST
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:05 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +struct ring_buffer {
> + unsigned long size;
> + unsigned pages;
> + unsigned flags;
> + int cpus;
> + atomic_t record_disabled;
> +
> + struct mutex mutex;
> +
> + /* FIXME: this should be online CPUS */
> + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *buffers[NR_CPUS];
actually nr_possible makes sense, and you might consider always
allocating buffers (and keeping them for offlined cpus) to avoid massive
allocations/frees cpu-hotplug events.
Mike Travis has been going over the kernel removing constructs like
this, and replacing them with dynamically allocated arrays of
nr_possible.
> +};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/