Re: [PATCH 0/12] memcg updates v5

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:43:09 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:24:55 +0900
> Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, there remains some bugs yet...
> > 
> 
> Thank you for your patient good test!
> 
> I'm now testing following (and will do over-night test.)
> In this an hour, this seems to work good. 
> (under your test which usually panics in 10-20min on my box.)
> 
This helps some, but causes other troubles. (But I know what it is.)
I'll add lock_page_cgroup() to charge side and see what happens.

Thanks,
-Kame



> ==
> page_cgroup is not valid until pc->mem_cgroup is set to appropriate value.
> There is a small race between Set-Used-Bit and Set-Proper-pc->mem_cgroup.
> This patch tries to fix that by adding PCG_VALID bit
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>  include/linux/page_cgroup.h |    3 +++
>  mm/memcontrol.c             |   22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct page_cgroup *lookup_page_cgroup(s
>  
>  enum {
>  	/* flags for mem_cgroup */
> +	PCG_VALID, /* you can access this page cgroup */
>  	PCG_LOCK,  /* page cgroup is locked */
>  	PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
>  	PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
> @@ -50,6 +51,10 @@ static inline int TestSetPageCgroup##una
>  /* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */
>  TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
>  
> +TESTPCGFLAG(Valid, VALID)
> +SETPCGFLAG(Valid, VALID)
> +CLEARPCGFLAG(Valid, VALID)
> +
>  TESTPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
>  CLEARPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
>  TESTSETPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
> Index: mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *
>  	if (!trylock_page_cgroup(pc))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && PageCgroupLRU(pc)) {
> +	if (PageCgroupValid(pc) && PageCgroupLRU(pc)) {
>  		mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
>  		mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(u
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pc, tmp, src, lru) {
>  		if (scan >= nr_to_scan)
>  			break;
> -		if (unlikely(!PageCgroupUsed(pc)))
> +		if (unlikely(!PageCgroupValid(pc)))
>  			continue;
>  		page = pc->page;
>  
> @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page 
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> +	if (!PageCgroupValid(pc)) {
>  		res_counter_uncharge(&to->res, PAGE_SIZE);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -580,6 +580,7 @@ __set_page_cgroup_lru(struct memcg_percp
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz, *prev_mz;
>  	struct page_cgroup *pc;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
>  	int i, nr;
>  
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
> @@ -589,6 +590,7 @@ __set_page_cgroup_lru(struct memcg_percp
>  
>  	for (i = nr - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>  		pc = mpv->vec[i];
> +		mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
>  		mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
>  		if (prev_mz != mz) {
>  			if (prev_mz)
> @@ -596,9 +598,11 @@ __set_page_cgroup_lru(struct memcg_percp
>  			prev_mz = mz;
>  			spin_lock(&mz->lru_lock);
>  		}
> -		if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && !PageCgroupLRU(pc)) {
> -			SetPageCgroupLRU(pc);
> -			__mem_cgroup_add_list(mz, pc);
> +		if (PageCgroupValid(pc) && !PageCgroupLRU(pc)) {
> +			if (mem == pc->mem_cgroup) {
> +				SetPageCgroupLRU(pc);
> +				__mem_cgroup_add_list(mz, pc);
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -790,6 +794,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_commit_charge(struct pag
>  	}
>  
>  	pc->mem_cgroup = mem;
> +	SetPageCgroupValid(pc);
>  	set_page_cgroup_lru(pc);
>  	css_put(&mem->css);
>  	preempt_enable();
> @@ -928,6 +933,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
>  		return;
>  	preempt_disable();
>  	lock_page_cgroup(pc);
> +	ClearPageCgroupValid(pc);
>  	ClearPageCgroupUsed(pc);
>  	mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
>  	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
> @@ -970,7 +976,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct 
>  
>  	pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>  	lock_page_cgroup(pc);
> -	if (PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
> +	if (PageCgroupValid(pc)) {
>  		mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
>  		css_get(&mem->css);
>  		if (PageCgroupCache(pc)) {
> @@ -1086,7 +1092,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(pc, tmp, list, lru) {
>  		page = pc->page;
> -		if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> +		if (!PageCgroupValid(pc))
>  			continue;
>  		/* For avoiding race with speculative page cache handling. */
>  		if (!PageLRU(page) || !get_page_unless_zero(page))
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/