Re: [Patch -tip 3/3] Tracing/ftrace: Don't consume entriesunhandled by mmiotrace
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sat Sep 27 2008 - 13:52:42 EST
* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2008/9/25 Pekka Paalanen <pq@xxxxxx>:
> > We can (must) return to this if/when multiple tracers are allowed
> > to be active simultaneously. But in the current situation, I do not
> > see a way to trace more than one thing, but I haven't really looked
> > into the other tracers.
>
> You can enable another tracer simultaneously. I never tried it but you
> can launch one from debugfs and another from kernel code for example.
> The new boot tracer will have to launch the sched_switch tracer.
hm, right now i can see a lot of problems with that approach - the
buffers are partly per tracer and partly global.
the new trace-ringbuffer design Steve is working on would abstract away
this complication - then we could make tracers truly independent
entities.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/