Re: [PATCH 05/31] cpumask: Provide new cpumask API

[Mike Travis]

Mike Travis wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
> 
>> In what way will Rusty's changes differ? Since you incorporate some of 
>> Rusty's changes already, could you please iterate towards a single 
>> patchset which we could then start testing?
> 
> Our timezones are not very conducive to a lot of email exchanges (and he's moving.)
>>From what I've seen I believe he's leaning towards using struct cpumask * and
> less trickery than I have.

Oh yeah, I forgot the other major point of Rusty's approach.  He wants the
patchset to be completely bisectable.  That's far from true in my version.  

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/