Re: Block integrity patches for 2.6.28

[Martin K. Petersen]

>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Jens> As far as I can tell, most of that commit is still fine. You
Jens> want bdev_get_integrity() in blkdev.h, the 3 other moves and the
Jens> unused bdev_get_tag_size() do not look like they are being used
Jens> by this patch set.

bdev_get_integrity() and bdev_get_tag_size() are being used by
stacking drivers and filesystems to prepare I/O.  It's correct that
none of the in-tree stuff currently uses bdev_get_tag_size().  That's
coming with the btrfs support.  If you want to pull that out for now
and have me put that back later in that's ok.  Just adds another
two-stage merge dependency for a later cycle.

bdev_integrity_enabled() and blk_integrity_tuple_size() are only being
used from within bio-integrity.c and can move there.  I originally put
them in blkdev.h because they are block device functions and not bio
ditto.

Want me to submit a new patch shuffling bdev_get_integrity() back
where it came from?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/